Dorms with No Alcohol Or Drugs College housing choices may rank near the top record of items that can influence your degree experience. Your memories of dorm, Greek or living that is off-campus stay with you the rest in your life and make for many interesting — and colorful — tales to generally share along with your kids and buddies because the years carry on.
At some universities, because of problems connected with over-enrollment, residing conditions have started off instead rocky. At Penn State’s University Park campus some years back, dorm room was therefore scarce that a number of incoming first-years had to live in a screened-off section of the main pupil union building. How weird is the fact that?
The overflow of enrollees one year required a gathering of modular homes (a.k.a at Princeton University. ‘trailers’) on a previous field that is athletic leading to exactly what appeared as if a tiny retirement community for older people. There have been some disparaging remarks made about those atypically housed first-years, nearly all of which originated in all the other Princetonians whom lived within the Gothic splendor of this other vaunted domestic colleges.
There is one option, but, that, if I had been headed to college today, I would definitely pursue due to the overall qualities and vow: substance-free housing (SFH). If you’re active in the college procedure at this time or understand an individual who is a college student who lives on campus, you’ve got probably heard about SFH. What is it and what could be some pros and cons about any of it?
Think about College Stereotypes
What is one of the most images that are common comes to mind when you picture stereotypes of college life? Fraternity parties? Empty beer kegs traveling through windows? Staggering pupils? The scent of hops, cigarette and barley or marijuana smoke permeating the atmosphere? Stereotypes occur for the explanation. They’re sometimes quite alarmingly accurate. Think Animal House.
If you should be deterred by these kinds of actions, then you may want to explore the SFH options during the universities to that you’re considering using or where you decide to enroll this spring. Used to do a search for schools that provide substance-free housing and, as usual, I happened to be overrun with links. One link that came up had been that one, which possessed a partial but interesting set of schools. Here’s a sampling:
Albright College (researching, Pa.): Single-sex floors, flats. Honors, first-year, substance-free and break housing
Bucknell University (Lewisburg, Pa.): Substance-free, Judaic studies, Afro-American studies and ecological cooperative housing
James Madison University (Harrisonburg, Va.): Theme housing for worldwide, learning and substance-free, and second-year experience communities. Fraternity houses located off how to write a literary analysis essay for a short story campus
nyc University (New York, N.Y.): health, theme, substance-free, first-year experience, sophomore experience, living learning and housing that is co-ed
Babson University (Babson Park, Mass.): Substance-free, special-interest and discounted housing
Is SFH Effective?
The more cynical among us may concern the effectiveness of SFH. I have heard doubters state that some SFH residents live where there are no ‘substances’ then again wander away from their SF dorms and head to events in some places. Therefore, they cite a component of hypocrisy. Exactly What do a little media state about how well SFH works?
‘ … since it works out, it does make a difference.,’ claims the brand new York Times. ‘No one claims that students who reside in substance-free housing abstain from smoking, alcohol consumption or making use of drugs. But at the very least in accordance with one study, they do not indulge as much as others. A 2001 research greater than 14,000 students nationwide unearthed that, in contrast cheaptermpapers.net to other pupils, only three-fifths as numerous residents of substance-free housing reported binge drinking in the earlier two weeks.
‘There had been other benefits, too. Students in substance-free housing, the study discovered, had been less likely to want to experience alcohol-related dilemmas, like getting behind in schoolwork, damaging home, getting into trouble because of the police or riding with a driver that is drunken.
‘There is, needless to say, a chicken-and-egg element to these findings. Pupils dreaming about an university experience that bears some relationship to Animal House are not more likely to go for substance-free housing. …
‘ … At many campuses, residents of regular dorms, as well as those assigned to housing that is substance-free did not demand, state they are glad the possibility exists.
”I think it is good that universities have a wellness option,’ said Beatrice Capestany, a freshman who was assigned to your wellness corridor of Vassar’s single remaining all-female dorm, although she did not request it. ‘My dorm is really a place that is really good keep coming back house to if I’ve gone away. It smells a whole lot nicer than various other dorms, too.’ On that same health corridor, Victoria Ramsey and Kathryn Thomas, both freshmen, could never be more pleased with their option.
”i don’t drink or smoke, and our corridor is quiet and clean,’ stated Ms. Ramsey.
‘Ms. Thomas included: ‘we desired a peaceful destination for studying. Sometimes it is a refuge, for folks who come and remain till they know the ongoing party on the flooring has died down.”
Okay. That is the side that is positive of SFH coin. To keep fair and balanced, let us take a good look at the flip side, and a few points from Andrew Gottlieb’s Why substance free housing is a idea that is bad
‘ I became amazed to discover that substance residents that are free permitted to take in, and even more surprised to learn that many do take in. Also despite these shocks, my freshmen experience has led me to simply take serious issue with the notion of substance-free housing. It’s merely unnecessary, unfair and divisive to designate floors that are entire substance free.
‘ … If someone is company in his / her decision not to partake in consuming, he/she could do this no matter where she or he lives. If he or she prefers not really to have liquor into the space, there may be an alternative to choose a substance free roomie, without designating entire floors as substance free.
‘The substance free designation is unjust because often the choice to live on a substance-free flooring is not kept in the possession of of a student. I have met numerous pupils whoever moms and dads forced them to call home for a sub-free floor, or even worse, I’ve met pupils who failed to ask to reside on a sub-free floor but had been placed on one anyway simply because Residential lifetime needed seriously to fill spaces. University is really a spot where at long final, young adults attain full independence. Making a living option which may be preferable to parents that are many not to ever kids is a disservice to pupils as well as an intrusion on the independency that college promises. …
‘ … truth be told that throughout nearly every Wash. U. graduate’s life, they have to work well with and probably live with or near individuals who don’t trust their decisions that are personal alcohol and other substances. a important possiblity to get ready for this facet of life is available in university. The chance to live with, comprehend and respect different choices of the classmates is priceless. Washington University should recognize this crucial opportunity and alter its housing policies, which currently hamper it.’
Gottlieb confirms that some SFH residents do, indeed, imbibe, which somewhat substantiates the hypocrisy argument, although you have to know the intent of each college’s SFH rules while the motives of these who choose to live there (and maybe the outlook of the who have been quartered here as being a matter of random positioning).
Some Schools Have Contracts
If you should be into highly quantified reasoning about SFH, you might care to always check the Journal out of Studies on Alcohol, funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Harvard Gazette recommendations that and attests to the positive part of SFH when it notes:
Residents of college housing where smoking and alcohol were prohibited were less likely to want to be victims of actions by students who were consuming. Findings from the Harvard School of Public Health university Alcohol learn show that substance-free university residence halls are making a direct impact in the work to lessen the harms that heavy ingesting produces among university students. It was the study that is first take a national look at the relationship between substance-free dorms and the effects of liquor on university campuses. …
Do SFH residents have to create a pledge they shall follow the rules of these university’s SFH charter? Here is a good example of just how Davidson College handles the SFH ‘contract’ [see my bold emphasis]:
We offer substance-free housing for those students who would like to reduce their publicity in their living environment to liquor and alcohol-related behavior, illicit medications and smoking cigarettes materials. Pupils located in these grouped communities accept not use alcohol or medications on their flooring community nor bring the effects of the substances back into the hall.
A link towards the substance-free housing application will be a part of a message from Jason Shaffer. Halls and/or floors to be designated as substance-free will likely be determined after applications are received.
All pupils selecting a substance free assignment are necessary to finish a substance housing contract that is free. Failure to uphold the objectives will result in relocation likely to some other assignment.
The College Confidential conversation forum people have actually debated the pros and cons of SFH. Here are some responses from this informative thread:
‘Our daughter had been afraid to choose sub-free her freshman 12 months it really meant in terms of the types of kids that she’d be paired with because she wasn’t sure what. It had been too general at her school. a dorm that is”quiet would’ve been one thing she’d have probably selected, but “sub-free” seemed too basic. Despite the fact that she actually is not really a partier, she’s got friends who’re. Into the end, she regretted not choosing it, I do believe. But it surely will depend on the college as well as the kid.’
‘At both my children’s big state universities, most of the dorms had been officially called ‘substance free’ but that did not stop children from doing whatever they wanted to do. My son knew some guys that got kicked out from the dorms in the very first semester of freshman year one for marijuana use and the other for drinking …’
‘My daughter did substance housing that is free first two years at a small liberal arts university. The youngsters had to sign an understanding they wouldn’t take in or smoke cigarettes in or come back to the dorm beneath the influence (or bring other people back under the impact). There was clearly no stigma, merely a nice dorm that is quiet wild parties. Like other people said, no vomit within the spaces that are public vandalism harm. Best part ended up being no body ever pulled the fire alarm the night’
Therefore, when you’re considering your university housing options, it may pay to see exactly how (or if) substance-free housing would match your plans. All the given information you’ll want to make a decision about this can be obtained in your colleges’ housing website pages. Give it a look!